Niceconcentrate

In modern ontological reflection, the question of non-actualized forms of being – those that exist not through action but through potentiality – is increasingly being raised. In this context, the concept of the nice concentrate is born – a core of joy and being that exists in consciousness as an unactualized, but actually felt particle of being. The nice concentrate is not an empirical experience, but an ontological residue that lies in consciousness and testifies to the inner fullness of being.

Classical metaphysics since the time of Aristotle has sought to distinguish between actual and potential being. Aristotle stated that “being is said in many ways” (Metaphysics, 1003a33), emphasizing that the diversity of existence cannot be reduced only to actuality. The nice concentrate extends this idea, interpreting potentiality not as a lack, but as a source of joy – a possibility of being that provides fullness even without happening.

​

The Concept and Ontological Nature of the Nice Concentrate

In contemporary ontological reflection, the question of forms of unactualized being – those that exist not through action but through potentiality – is increasingly being raised. In this context, the concept of the nice concentrate is born – it is the nucleus of joy and being that exists in consciousness as an unactualized, but actually felt particle of being. The nice concentrate is not an empirical experience, but an ontological residue that lies in consciousness and testifies to the inner fullness of being.

Classical metaphysics, since the time of Aristotle, has sought to distinguish between actual and potential being. Aristotle stated that “being is said in many ways” (Metaphysics, 1003a33), emphasizing that the diversity of existence cannot be reduced only to actuality. Niceconcentrate extends this idea, interpreting potentiality not as a deficiency, but as a source of joy – a possibility of being that provides fulfillment even without happening.

​

Ontology of Potential Joy

The niceconcentrate is a form of potential joy. It testifies that happiness can exist as pure being, not as an actual experience. Aristotle writes in the Nicomachean Ethics: “Activity according to virtue is happiness” (Nicomachean Ethics, 1098a16), but the ontology of the niceconcentrate suggests a more radical approach – happiness can also be inactive, exist as a state of being, independent of ethical or practical realization.

In this respect, the niceconcentrate is close to Kierkegaard’s concept of “inner joy”. Kierkegaard argued that “joy is not an external event, but an inner connection with being” (Either/Or, 1843, p. 217). The niceconcentrate is precisely this connection – silent, unmanifest, but ontologically present.

In his work Difference and Repetition (1968), Deleuze speaks of “virtuality” as a real but unactualized dimension of being: “Virtuality is not opposed to reality, but only to actuality” (Deleuze, 1968, p. 211). This quote perfectly captures the nature of the niceconcentrate – it is real but unactualized; it exists as an internal, unmanifested form of happiness that nevertheless has ontological weight.

​

Niceconcentrate and Classical Theories of Being

The idea of ​​the Niceconcentrate rethinks the classical question of the knowledge of being. Parmenides already stated: “To think and to be are the same” (On Being, fragment 3), emphasizing that being exists only insofar as it is thought. However, the Niceconcentrate opens up another path – it exists without thinking, as an inner being that does not require reflection in order to be real. It is a form of being that exists in pure experience, even when consciousness does not distinguish it conceptually.

In Heidegger’s view, “being is not a thing, but that which allows things to be things” (Heidegger, 1927, p. 230). The concept of the Niceconcentrate extends this idea, claiming that being can allow not only things to be, but also inner states – joy, peace, remembrance. Being in the niceconcentrate becomes not objective but intimately subjective, not material but affective.

It is also worth remembering Husserl’s remark about the “living present” – a stream of consciousness in which past and future intentions are preserved: “Every present has within itself a trace of the past and a premonition of future possibility” (Lectures on the Phenomenology of Internal Time-Consciousness, 1928, p. 34). The niceconcentrate is precisely this trace – it preserves the joy of the past as a living but non-actual presence.

​
The ontology of the niceconcentrate offers a new concept of being that transcends the traditional opposition between actuality and potentiality. It is a form of being that exists in consciousness as a condensate of joy – non-actualized but real.

Drawing on Aristotle, Plato, Heidegger, Husserl, Kierkegaard and Deleuze, it can be argued that the nice concentrate embodies the concept of being as an inner light. It testifies that the fullness of existence may lie not in action, but in pure being – in potential, quietly shining joy.

The study of the nice concentrate opens up new directions for ontological and phenomenological reflection. It allows us to speak of being not only as actual existence, but also as the inner core of being, which gives a person identity, joy and existential peace. From this point of view, the nice concentrate becomes not only a philosophical category, but also an ontological metaphor of human being – embodying the very possibility of being happy through being oneself.