Philosophy of Things: From Phenomenology to Modern Ontology

The philosophy of things, also called the ontology of things or the philosophy of objects, is a school of thought that analyzes things not as passive backgrounds of human experience, but as autonomous forms of being. The question of what a thing (Latin: res) is has accompanied philosophy since Aristotle's Metaphysics, in which he states that "that which is is said in many senses" (Metaphysica, IV, 2).

 

1. Classical outlines of the concept of things
In Plato's theory of ideas, things are only shadows - a way of participating in the Ideas. Aristotle gives them a more independent position, treating them as substances with form and matter (hylē and morphē). However, in this classical metaphysics, things are still subordinated to the horizon of human cognition and the cosmic order.

​

2. Phenomenological analysis of the object
Edmund Husserl radically rethinks the thing in the context of phenomenology. In his opinion, “the thing is a unity of meaningfulness that appears through various intentions” (Ideen I, §44). This means that the thing is not just an empirical object, but a phenomenon whose being opens up to acts of consciousness. For Martin Heidegger, the thing (das Ding) is not an instrumental means, but an “assembly” (Versammlung) that unites earth, sky, mortals, and gods (Das Ding, 1950).

​

3. The autonomization of things in the 20th century
At the end of the 20th century, efforts to free the thing from anthropocentrism emerged in philosophy. In Bruno Latour's actor-network theory, things are agents of action: "Things make us as much as we make them" (Nous n'avons jamais été modernes, 1991). Maurizio Ferraris, in his "New Realism", speaks of the documentary being of things, which exists independently of interpretations.

​

4. Object-oriented ontology (OOO)
Graham Harman argues that “things are more than their relations, more than their appearances” (Tool-Being, 2002). A thing according to OOO is ontologically inaccessible, it always hides behind its phenomenal expressions. This means that every object, be it a stone, a person, or a fictional character, has its own reality, independent of human intentions.

​

5. Critical evaluation
The philosophy of things today challenges modern epistemology and anthropocentrism. It allows for new ways of thinking about ecological relationships (nature as an active participant), technology (artifacts as autonomous actors), and aesthetics (the work of art as an independent object, not just a carrier of the creator's intention).

The philosophy of things invites us to rethink the very task of philosophy: whether we should talk about the world for us or about the world that exists around us and without us. This requires an ontological posture of humility, which Heidegger would describe as “allowing things to be what they are” (Sein und Zeit, §43).